Tinubu should channel fuel subsidy money on infrastructural development’

A frontline politician in Ogun, Ambassador Olufemi Ajadi Oguntoyinbo has given his backing to the proposal tabled before the President, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, by the Trade Union Congress, (TUC), that due to the removal of subsidy on petroleum products, the minimum wage should be increased from N30,000 to N200,000.

Recall that the TUC at its meeting with the Presidential Committee last Sunday among its 14 proposals tabled at the meeting demanded that the minimum wage should be fixed at N200,000.

Ajadi, who was the gubernatorial candidate of the New Nigeria People’s Party (NNPP), Ogun state in the 2023 general elections in a statement on Wednesday said he supported the demand for the new minimum wage of N200,000 as a result of the multiplier effect of the removal of petroleum products subsidy, saying everything including cost of foodstuffs, transportation among others are already going up and an average worker in the country will be suffocated if the minimum wage falls below N200,000.

He also advised the Federal Government to judiciously channel the removed subsidy on infrastructural development to enhance economic development and growth in the country.

Ajadi specifically said the Federal Government should also build low-cost housing for workers to ensure that they have roof over their heads, saying the cost of accommodation is not affordable to an average worker in the country.

He said the pronouncement by President Tinubu that petroleum subsidy is gone is being supported by many Nigerians because of alleged frauds that have been trailed it in the past years but said the Federal Government should as part of the palliative being proposed consider giving workers affordable accommodation through mortgage, saying the payment should be spread across 25-30 years of active service.

Ajadi stated that the trillions of naira, being committed yearly by the Federal Government on fuel subsidies has no positive impact on the poor because it was meant to enrich the few rich.

While advising that the government on its part should be sincere to spend the money from the removed subsidy judiciously in developing infrastructure such as mass transportation, agriculture, schools, hospitals that will be accessible to the masses, stressing that, that is the only way the people can benefit from the removal of the fuel subsidy.